Well if concert value was measured strictly in number of songs, this would be a standout: Paul and the boys pretty much played two concerts. Full band, acoustic, and then some rousing oldies.
The new album, ubnfortunately, came across quite poorly in the first set. Sound mix didn't appear bad per se, but all in all it was a bit muddled musically. Very little interest, no acknowledgment from Paul to the crowd - let alone any banter. The room had an aura of "Well, he's a legend so I guess this has to be great" about it.
The acoustic set, interestingly, was far more integrated musically.
And then once he finished playing the new album (song by song), the "third" set was where the night finally picked up. It wasn't just the better variety of songs, but even the band seemed to now have more itnerest in what they were doing. And yes, he threw in a few Jam songs to get the crowd well into it.
So a very mediocre slow burn to start, but thoroughly picked up. I'd say this is a classic example where cutting 30 minutes would have made for a better show.